| Description | This collection consists of eight oversize printed portfolios containing photographs of evidence relating to the Bhowal Sanyasi law court case, India. The items in this collection originate from the Appeal from Original Decree (Sreemati Bibhabati Devi v. Ramendra Narayan Roy), over which Costello presided as Acting Chief of Justice. This part of the trial took place at the High Court of Judicature, Fort William, Bengal, India, 1939. Also included is a box of newspaper cuttings relating to the case taken from The Statesman, Calcutta, 1939, as well as court schedule lists, 1939. Two boxes of photographs of evidence were added in 2008.
There are also ten boxes containing approximately 80 volumes of typescript transcripts of evidence given in court, discussion of the case and some administrative detail regarding witnesses, telegrams and procedures. |
| Admin History | Sir Leonard Wilfred James Costello (1881-1972), lawyer, politician and judge, was born in London on 25 Aug 1881, eldest son of James and Alice Costello. He was educated at Dulwich College, reading for a BA and LLB at Peterhouse, Cambridge in 1902, and an MA in 1906. He was called to the Bar (Inner Temple) in 1903, and practised in London and on the Midland circuit between 1903 and 1926. He was a lecturer in Common Law at University College, Nottingham, 1906-1908. He was a High Court judge in Calcutta between 1926 and 1940, and was also Acting Chief of Justice, Bengal, during May-Aug 1937 and again from Jul-Aug 1939. He was MP (Liberal) for Huntingdonshire from 1923-1924, and was High Sheriff of Devon 1945-1946. He published articles on policies and economics, as well as The Pocket Law Lexicon (1921) and The Profiteering Act, 1919, fully annotated (with Richard O'Sullivan, 1919).
Costello was knighted in 1935, and awarded a CBE in 1946. He married twice, first to Winifred Avery in 1907 and secondly to Joan Piper in 1952. With his first wife, he had two daughters. He died at Uffculme, Devon, on 2 Dec 1972.
The Bhowal Sanyasi case ran from 1933 to 1946, creating a sensation across India, with courts involved in London, Calcutta and Dhaka. The case was concerned with the dispute of inheritance of an estate and the identity of the Second Kumar of Bhawal (a Bengali princeling or zamindar) who was declared dead under mysterious circumstances, and who came back to life after twelve years. |